Return to main website

Insurance loophole claimed in fire deaths

December 17, 2008

An insurance company with a potential $25 million liability from a 2007 Houston office fire is claiming smoke that killed three people was “pollution” and surviving families shouldn’t be compensated for their losses since the deaths were not caused directly by the actual flames.

 

Great American Insurance Company is arguing in a Houston federal court that the section of the insurance policy that excludes payments for pollution — like discharges or seepage that require cleanup — would also exclude payouts for damages, including deaths, caused by smoke, or pollution, that results from a fire.

 

“This is shocking. It’s an extraordinary effort by an insurance company to avoid paying on a contract for insurance,” said Randy Sorrels, who represents several family members in wrongful death lawsuits from the fire in a six-story atrium building on the North Loop.

 

Great American has asked U.S. District Judge Lee Rosenthal to find that the deaths caused by the smoke, fumes and soot from the March 2007 fire set by a nurse working in the building will not be covered by the policy because there is a specific exclusion for pollution and it mentions smoke, fumes and soot.

 

Read Article: Houston Chronicle

 

Posted By: Phoenix DUI Attorney

Post tags:

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment

Recent Posts

Archived Posts

Blogroll

Pages

 

February 2012
M T W T F S S
« Nov    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829  

Meta