Blue Bell firm in age-bias lawsuit
September 23, 2008
It’s probably not a good idea – even as a joke – to ask a human resources person applying for a job the age question.
Asking about age is illegal because age discrimination is illegal, under federal law.
Now a Blue Bell communications company, which employs 5,000 technicians nationwide, is being sued because its major investor allegedly posed this question to a 55-year-old job candidate for the position of human resources director:
“How old are you, 78?”
Accusing Unitek USA L.L.C. of age discrimination, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission yesterday sued the company in federal court in Philadelphia.
Unitek takes the allegations seriously, said the company’s attorney, Colin Dougherty.
“Certainly it feels it has done nothing wrong in this case and looks forward to vindicating its position through litigation,” he said.
According to the suit, Frank Bruno, of Audubon, Montgomery County, had aced interviews with Unitek’s top management, who all but assured him he had the job. He only needed one final interview with Joseph Kestenbaum, Unitek’s major investor, the suit says. Kestenbaum is not a defendant in the suit.
Read Article Philadelphia Inquirer
Posted By Phoenix Accident Injury Attorneys </a
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
Recent Posts
- New York City Police Arrest Alleged Terror Suspect
- Bill Gates Testifies in $1B Lawsuit Against Microsoft
- Former AIG Chief Sues Government Over Bailout
- Conrad Murray judge won’t allow new lab tests on evidence in case
- Hundreds of UC Davis students protest pepper-spraying by police
- Suspect in White House shooting makes brief court appearance, remains jailed
- Man sues over 8-year-old wedding photos
- Cities struggle to deal with occupy movement
- Supreme Court to hear dispute on health care law
- NBA players say no to deal, season could be over
- Husband gets Dodgers in McCourt divorce deal
- Report: Polygamist leader Warren Jeffs in coma
- Suspect in Gardner case was beneficiary of $1.5 million death policy
- Clemens’ defense attorneys push judge to drop case
- Texas court allows ‘sin tax’ for strip club patrons
Archived Posts
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (43)
- July 2011 (48)
- June 2011 (53)
- June 2010 (39)
- May 2010 (27)
- April 2010 (57)
- March 2010 (168)
- February 2010 (144)
- January 2010 (119)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (165)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (29)
- April 2009 (61)
- March 2009 (140)
- February 2009 (156)
- January 2009 (151)
- December 2008 (143)
- November 2008 (113)
- October 2008 (192)
- September 2008 (88)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (29)
Blogroll
Pages
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
