Class-action lawsuit over tobacco ads proceeds
June 5, 2009
Consumers have the right to sue as a group over advertising they believe misled them into buying products, a divided state Supreme Court ruled Monday in reinstating a massive suit against the tobacco industry.
The 4-3 decision rejected business arguments that, if accepted, would have virtually prohibited class-action suits for false advertising by requiring proof that every plaintiff – millions of them, in some cases – had seen an allegedly deceptive ad and relied on it to make a purchase. The court majority said that evidence is required only for the single plaintiff or small group that represents the entire class.
“This gives the consumers rights to protect themselves from fraudulent advertising,” said Mark Robinson, a lawyer for the smokers who sued tobacco companies in 1997.
The ruling could make California “the class-action capital of the country,” retorted William Stern, a lawyer for business organizations and a co-author of Proposition 64, a 2004 ballot measure at the heart of the case.
Read Article: San Francisco Chronicle
Posted By: Phoenix DUI Attorney
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
Recent Posts
- New York City Police Arrest Alleged Terror Suspect
- Bill Gates Testifies in $1B Lawsuit Against Microsoft
- Former AIG Chief Sues Government Over Bailout
- Conrad Murray judge won’t allow new lab tests on evidence in case
- Hundreds of UC Davis students protest pepper-spraying by police
- Suspect in White House shooting makes brief court appearance, remains jailed
- Man sues over 8-year-old wedding photos
- Cities struggle to deal with occupy movement
- Supreme Court to hear dispute on health care law
- NBA players say no to deal, season could be over
- Husband gets Dodgers in McCourt divorce deal
- Report: Polygamist leader Warren Jeffs in coma
- Suspect in Gardner case was beneficiary of $1.5 million death policy
- Clemens’ defense attorneys push judge to drop case
- Texas court allows ‘sin tax’ for strip club patrons
Archived Posts
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (43)
- July 2011 (48)
- June 2011 (53)
- June 2010 (39)
- May 2010 (27)
- April 2010 (57)
- March 2010 (168)
- February 2010 (144)
- January 2010 (119)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (165)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (29)
- April 2009 (61)
- March 2009 (140)
- February 2009 (156)
- January 2009 (151)
- December 2008 (143)
- November 2008 (113)
- October 2008 (192)
- September 2008 (88)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (29)
Blogroll
Pages
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||
