AT&T wins court case on pre-1979 maternity leaves
June 5, 2009
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday for AT&T Inc in a dispute over how retirement benefits should be calculated for women who took maternity leaves before the federal Pregnancy Discrimination Act took effect in 1979.
By a 7-2 vote, the justices overturned a U.S. appeals court ruling that AT&T had violated federal civil rights law by not granting women credit for their entire pregnancy-related leaves taken before 1979.
The 1979 law barred companies from treating pregnancy leaves differently from other disability leaves. Since then, maternity leave has been considered disability leave and has been credited toward retirement.
The ruling was a defeat for four AT&T employees who each took at least one maternity leave between 1968 and 1976 and had sued. AT&T at the time allowed pregnant women up to 30 days of paid leave, but the women lost between 67 and 261 days of uncredited leave.
Read Article: Reuters
Posted By: Phoenix DUI Attorney
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL
Leave a comment
Recent Posts
- New York City Police Arrest Alleged Terror Suspect
- Bill Gates Testifies in $1B Lawsuit Against Microsoft
- Former AIG Chief Sues Government Over Bailout
- Conrad Murray judge won’t allow new lab tests on evidence in case
- Hundreds of UC Davis students protest pepper-spraying by police
- Suspect in White House shooting makes brief court appearance, remains jailed
- Man sues over 8-year-old wedding photos
- Cities struggle to deal with occupy movement
- Supreme Court to hear dispute on health care law
- NBA players say no to deal, season could be over
- Husband gets Dodgers in McCourt divorce deal
- Report: Polygamist leader Warren Jeffs in coma
- Suspect in Gardner case was beneficiary of $1.5 million death policy
- Clemens’ defense attorneys push judge to drop case
- Texas court allows ‘sin tax’ for strip club patrons
Archived Posts
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (43)
- July 2011 (48)
- June 2011 (53)
- June 2010 (39)
- May 2010 (27)
- April 2010 (57)
- March 2010 (168)
- February 2010 (144)
- January 2010 (119)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (165)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (29)
- April 2009 (61)
- March 2009 (140)
- February 2009 (156)
- January 2009 (151)
- December 2008 (143)
- November 2008 (113)
- October 2008 (192)
- September 2008 (88)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (29)
Blogroll
Pages
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Nov | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | ||||