Recent Posts
- U.S. Supreme Court to hear vaccine case
- L.A. settles accident lawsuit for $7 million
- Judge ends 26 years of special education oversight for city schools
- Cranberry couple sues Target after trunk injures toddler
- Sacramento jury awards record $24.3 million to girl run over by dad’s truck
- Lawsuit pits Va. convicts against state parole board
- Goldman Sachs sued by big pension fund over pay
- Botox maker is not liable in girl’s death, O.C. jury says
- Suit alleging torture in Iraq can proceed
- Lawsuit takes aim at stun-gun manufacturer; Watsonville man says he suffered permanent injuries after being shocked in 2006
- Court awards bullied student $800,000
- Lawsuit Filed In Canton Hit-And-Run Case
- POLLS: Texting while driving caused death of North Naples bicyclist, Collier lawsuit contends
- Concerns Over ‘Metal on Metal’ Hip Implants
- Flavoring Ingredient Recalled; Risk of Illness Seen as Low
Archived Posts
- March 2010 (52)
- February 2010 (144)
- January 2010 (119)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (165)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (29)
- April 2009 (61)
- March 2009 (140)
- February 2009 (156)
- January 2009 (151)
- December 2008 (143)
- November 2008 (113)
- October 2008 (192)
- September 2008 (88)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (29)
Blogroll
Pages
Meta
Sue the company? Most contracts force consumers to forfeit that right
June 5, 2009
If you have a credit card, a cellphone or even just a job, chances are you’ve already signed away your right to sue if something goes wrong.
Mandatory arbitration clauses have become a routine part of the fine print in most financial, telecom and employment contracts, as well as numerous other customer agreements. They typically require you to abandon the right to a jury trial or class-action lawsuit, and to agree instead to take any grievances to a professional arbitrator.
But because of the way the system is set up, critics say, arbitration often favors the company and not the individual. So the likelihood of a positive outcome (for you) can be less than if you had pursued litigation. Consumer advocates, sensing a shift in the political winds under President Obama, believe the time is right to challenge mandatory arbitration and have banded together to support legislation ending the practice.
Read Article: Los Angeles Times
Posted By: Phoenix DUI Attorney
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL