Recent Posts
- Octuplets mom Nadya Suleman settles her workers’ comp case
- Lawsuit alleges UMC misclassified patients, overcharged millions
- Stabbing victim files civil suit against family
- Potentially deadly ice cream recalled
- Fatal I-75 crash in 2009 spawns lawsuit against Collier teacher
- Spencer Reed Group to Settle EEOC Race and Age Discrimination Lawsuit
- Sickened September 11 workers get revised settlement
- Metro sports giants clash in court
- Wrongful death lawsuit filed against 4 New Orleans cops in Henry Glover case
- Starwatch consumer | BMW, VW issue recalls
- Wrigley Settles False-Ad Class Action For $6M
- New sex abuse suit filed against Los Angeles Archdiocese
- Police, fire unions sue Baltimore over pensions
- Woman falls asleep on United flight, wakes up alone after plane lands
- Carradine’s wife sues film company
Archived Posts
- June 2010 (39)
- May 2010 (27)
- April 2010 (57)
- March 2010 (168)
- February 2010 (144)
- January 2010 (119)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (165)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (29)
- April 2009 (61)
- March 2009 (140)
- February 2009 (156)
- January 2009 (151)
- December 2008 (143)
- November 2008 (113)
- October 2008 (192)
- September 2008 (88)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (29)
Blogroll
Pages
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jun | ||||||
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
Meta
New trial ordered in lawsuit over Sprint fees for early contract terminations
January 30, 2009
The battle will continue over $300 million that Sprint Nextel charged customers who prematurely canceled their calling contracts.
A California judge issued a new ruling this week ordering a new trial in the class-action case. The former Sprint customers were challenging the company’s ability to charge so-called early-termination fees of as much as $200 each if they scrapped service before the expiration of their calling contract. Sprint is challenging the new ruling.
Cell phone companies say they resort to such fees to protect their ability to recover subsidies that allowed patrons to receive free or reduced-price phones. But customers sometimes say that the quality of service degrades long before contracts are up and that they want other options. Or they would like to sign up for better offers with other companies.
Read Article: Kansas City Star
Posted By: Phoenix DUI Attorney
No Comments »
No comments yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL