October 31, 2008
On Wednesday, the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee released a report showing that at least two top FDA officials objected to making changes to federal rules regarding labeling for prescription drugs. The changes, made in 2006, created a new labeling system, with the most important warnings for doctors placed in a “highlights” section at the top of a label’s first page.
The new rules also banned drug companies from adding warnings to “highlights” sections without prior FDA approval — a move that critics claim was aimed at pre-empting lawsuits against drug companies. The report from U.S. Rep. Henry A. Waxman, D-Calif., who is chairman of the committee, suggests FDA officials made the changes to follow a Bush administration policy of protecting drug companies.
The report’s release comes as the U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments Monday in the landmark Wyeth v. Levine pre-emption case.
Sheldon Bradshaw, now a partner at Hunton & Williams, oversaw the labeling-regulation overhaul in question during his stint as the FDA’s chief counsel from 2005-2007. He chatted about the House report and other issues with The Am Law Daily.
Read Article: Law.com
Concrete that was poured at more than 100 construction projects around the city, including the Freedom Tower, the new Yankee Stadium and the Jet Blue Terminal at Kennedy Airport, over the past decade has been or will be re-examined because a testing company did not do its job, state prosecutors said on Thursday.
All of the structures are believed to be safe, several city officials said, although they might deteriorate sooner than expected if the concrete is below standards.
The testing company, Testwell Laboratories, the city’s leading concrete-testing firm, and several of its officials were indicted on Thursday on charges that they failed to perform strength tests and billed clients, including a number of public agencies, for work that was never performed.
Read Article: New York Times
After several years in which Americans were buying stuff on credit they couldn’t afford, a rapidly increasing number are complaining about getting harassed and abused by bill collectors.
Nearly 71,000 people filed such complaints with the Federal Trade Commission last year, roughly double the number in 2003. In addition, more than 14,000 complained to the Better Business Bureau. Thousands more lodged grievances with state and city officials.
“And it is going to get worse,” warned David Polino, a Better Business Bureau expert on collection agencies and president of the BBB chapter in upstate New York. “With the recession, with the horrible credit problems, this is going to be off the charts.”
Regulators and consumer groups say the rise in complaints reflects the rapidly increasing number of Americans who took on more debt than they could handle during the free-spending, easy-credit days that preceded the current economic crisis. The complaints are also being attributed to the explosive growth in the number of companies that buy up bad consumer debt at a discount and try to collect whatever they can.
Read Article: Las Vegas Sun
The costume police are out.
With Halloween just around the corner, labor and employment attorneys are warning employers that the annual holiday could get scary — in a legal way — if costumes, or a work party, get out of hand.
Specifically, costumes that carry a political or social message, or are simply too raunchy for the workplace, could lead to a liability nightmare down the road.
“A naughty nurse can get you into trouble,” warned attorney Steve Miller of the Chicago office of Atlanta’s Fisher & Phillips, noting that certain costumes can set the stage for future harassment. “When you got the mix of alcohol, and somebody wearing a revealing costume, you run that risk of someone making a lewd comment.”
Other costumes that scream liability?
A French maid, kittens, men in togas, male Tarzans and construction workers — all of these costumes are likely to trigger sex talk, Miller said. And if the comments continue in the future, that could trigger a harassment complaint.
Read Article: Law.com
A Florida Supreme Court ruling issued Thursday will help the widow of an anthrax victim make her case that the government was ultimately responsible for her husband’s death.
Maureen Stevens’ husband, Robert, was a photo editor who was exposed to anthrax mailed to the Boca Raton office of American Media Inc., a supermarket tabloid publisher, in 2001. He was the first of five people killed and 17 others sickened in a series of similar attacks.
Justices ruled 4-1 that the defendants had a duty under Florida law to protect the public against the unauthorized release of lethal materials. It’s an important, although preliminary, victory for the widow whose $50 million federal lawsuit also alleges the government and Battelle Memorial Institute, a private laboratory in Columbus, Ohio, were the source of the anthrax.
Read Article: Miami Herald
Newer Posts »
- Mother gives birth to quadruplets while battling cancer
- Veteran gets a ‘smart’ home
- 17 foot pregnant python found in Florida
- Colorado Theater Massacre
- Nazi suspect arrested in Hungary
- Mentally disabled daughter left at a bar intentionally
- Wisconsin Coach punches teen player after a loss
- Drunk driver kills pregnant woman, baby critical condition
- Woman catches baby who falls three stories
- Colorado Waldo Canyon Wildfire
- Bus monitor is bullied by students
- Man decapitates daughter for her ‘indecent behavior’
- Estimated 18 Million cancer survivors by 2022
- Face-chewing victim is awake and alert
- Woman set on fire at 7- eleven
- October 2012 (1)
- September 2012 (1)
- August 2012 (1)
- July 2012 (6)
- June 2012 (8)
- May 2012 (11)
- April 2012 (7)
- March 2012 (1)
- November 2011 (10)
- October 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (43)
- July 2011 (48)
- June 2011 (53)
- June 2010 (39)
- May 2010 (27)
- April 2010 (57)
- March 2010 (168)
- February 2010 (144)
- January 2010 (119)
- December 2009 (8)
- November 2009 (164)
- October 2009 (1)
- June 2009 (29)
- April 2009 (61)
- March 2009 (140)
- February 2009 (156)
- January 2009 (151)
- December 2008 (143)
- November 2008 (113)
- October 2008 (192)
- September 2008 (88)
- August 2008 (8)
- July 2008 (29)